Cases 41 - 50 of 375
TAYLOR v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv02390
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. SHEIFF DEPT
as 1:2022cv02273
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Defendant:
SHEIFF DEPT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. HUBER et al
as 1:2022cv02070
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Defendant:
HUBER and SHELLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv05375
Plaintiff:
Deavalon Mack
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MACK v. PUGLIESE et al
as 1:2022cv01522
Plaintiff:
Andre Mack
Defendant:
Nicolas Pugliese and DOORDASH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Chicago Title Land Trust Company et al v. Possibility Place Nursery, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03875
Plaintiff:
Chicago Title Land Trust Company, Steven W. Becker, Thomas J. Becker and others
Defendant:
Possibility Place Nursery, Inc., Connor B. Shaw, Tristan Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. NELSON
as 1:2022cv01332
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Defendant:
SHANE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintella Bounds v. Country Club Hills School District 160, et al
as 22-2032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTELLA BOUNDS, Doctor
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTRY CLUB HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 160, TAMARA YOUNG, Doctor, JACQUELINE DOSS and others
TAYLOR v. TAYLOR
as 1:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Defendant:
DARLENE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
