Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Roach v. Sheriff
as 3:2014cv02056
Petitioner: David Roach
Respondent: Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00366
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
ROACHE v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01446
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff: KAREN E. ROACHE
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROACH et al v. LOHORN et al
as 1:2014cv01196
Defendant: DAVID A. AULT, CITY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JONES and DAVID ROACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENLEY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2014cv00176
Defendant: R. CONNOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ROACHE
Plaintiff: JAMES HENLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00354
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00020
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROACH v. KNIGHT
as 1:2012cv01262
Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner: RUSSELL W. ROACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roach v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00289
Plaintiff: Kenneth Roach
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00082
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?