Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Montague v. Hargett et al
as 1:2017cv01209
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Montague
Defendant:
Robert Hargett, All Shriner's of America, U.S. Army and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birner v. U.S. Marshall Service
as 3:2017cv00092
Plaintiff:
Curtis W Birner
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheurich v. U.S. Marshalls
as 3:2016cv00876
Plaintiff:
David Scheurich
Defendant:
U.S. Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bell v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv05858
Petitioner:
Melvin T. Bell
Respondent:
United States, United States Attorney Office and U.S. Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Summit Police Dept. et al
as 1:2016cv04640
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Summit Police Dept., U.S. Marshalls , D.E.A. Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWALLERS v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2016cv00656
Defendant:
F.B.I., U.S MARSHALS SERVICE and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff:
BRENT SWALLERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAN v. SKAGGS et al
as 1:2015cv02073
Defendant:
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larry Ealy v. Susan Dlott, et al
as 15-2218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. EALY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN DLOTT, Judge, in her professional and individual capacities, MICHAEL R. BARRETT, Judge, in his professional and individual capacities, JEREMY ROSE, in professional and individual capacities and others
EALY et al v. DLOTT et al
as 1:2015cv00669
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, BRAD BIERMAN, SUSAN DLOTT and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE Q. ELLIS EALY, LARRY E. EALY and SCLG-LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doss v. Orr et al
as 1:2015cv02521
Plaintiff:
Reginald Doss
Defendant:
Aimee Orr, Dr, Hess, Kankakee County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
