Cases 41 - 50 of 228
Brown-Davis et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2019cv05392
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith, Kristie Kolacny, Siobhan E. Fannin and others
Defendant:
The Retirement Plan Committee of the Walgreen Profit-Sharing Retirement Trust, Walgreen Co., Does 1-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hosea v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv01274
Plaintiff:
Jason Hosea
Defendant:
Glad Trash Bags, Xfinity Center, Old Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEEKS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2018cv02093
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EARL WEEKS
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Weeks et al
as 3:2018cv50130
Plaintiff:
Calvin Green
Defendant:
Weeks, Jonja Nicklucz and James Martens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Weeks et al
as 3:2018cv50127
Plaintiff:
Calvin Green
Defendant:
Weeks, Sonja Nicklaus and James Martens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Johnson v. Jason Dalke, et al
as 18-1459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON DALKE, sued in his individual capacity, PETER G. ALBA, sued in his individual capacity, MICHAEL M. GORMAN, Superintendant, sued in his individual capacity and others
Miller v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al.
as 3:2018cv50008
Plaintiff:
Harley T. Miller
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., John Vargo, Amber Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Dalke et al
as 3:2017cv50384
Defendant:
Jason Dalke, Mr. Block, Lt. Kinudson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weeks et al v. UMR, Inc.
as 4:2017cv04311
Plaintiff:
Joanne Weeks and Marchele Mahnesmith
Defendant:
UMR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Beezley v. Fenix Parts, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07896
Plaintiff:
Amanda Beezley , Thomas Weeks , Douglas Barnard and others
Defendant:
Fenix Parts, Inc. , Kent Robertson , Scott Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
