Cases 41 - 50 of 2,139
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicolette Langston, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 24-8012
Petitioner:
NICOLETTE A. LANGSTON, as Administrator of the Estate of ZACK LANGSTON and DANAE YOUNG, as mother and next friend for D.L., a minor
Respondent:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and MID-AMERICA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50061
Plaintiff:
Travionte Williams
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Dr. J. Chess, Dr. M. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
MARION LEE YOUNG, I
Defendant:
WENDY RUSSELL, M. KOLHOUSE and KNOX CO. JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Deandre Davis
Defendant:
C/O Baker, Christopher Kern, Matthew Dulaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Terrez Young v. Erin Sheedy, et al
as 24-1235
Plaintiff:
TERREZ M. YOUNG
Defendant:
ERIN SHEEDY, Officer, JOSHUA A. MEYER, JORDAN J. GARRISON, Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
