Cases 51 - 60 of 243
Acevedo v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv01146
Plaintiff:
Daniel Acevedo
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Lake County Sheriffs Office, Mark Curan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flecha, Joshua et al v. Metal Systems, LLC
as 3:2016cv00800
Plaintiff:
Joshua Flecha and Luis Acevedo
Defendant:
Metal Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Francisco Calderon-Acevedo v. USA
as 16-3566
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCISCO CALDERON-ACEVEDO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CALDERON-ACEVEDO v. QUINTANA et al
as 1:2016cv01422
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO CALDERON-ACEVEDO
Respondent:
FRANCISCO QUINTANA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Acevedo v. Lake County Sheriff's Officer Marte et al
as 1:2016cv03479
Plaintiff:
Daniel Acevedo
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriff's Officer Marte , Lake County Sheriff's Officer Sapyta , Lake County Sheriff's Officer Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv02890
Plaintiff:
Clarence Smith
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Police Officer Justin Conner, Star No.: 18863, Police Officer Eric Haney, Star No.: 3591 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. National Credit Adjusters, LLC
as 1:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Elsa Acevedo
Defendant:
National Credit Adjusters, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Neat v. Chicago Transit Authority et al
as 1:2015cv09130
Plaintiff:
Anndrewnettea Neat
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 241, Medrick Bussie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Mystic Blue Cruises, Inc. v. Acevedo
as 1:2015cv06230
Plaintiff:
Mystic Blue Cruises, Inc.
Defendant:
Jean Carlos Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
