Cases 51 - 60 of 78
BLEVINS v. PATTON et al
as 1:2010cv00998
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS
Defendant:
OFC. HENSLEY, OFC. LABOYTEAUX, SGT. D. PATTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2462
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Blevins v. US Marshal's Service et al
as 3:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Blevins
Defendant:
US Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLEVINS v. TURNER et al
as 1:2010cv00614
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS
Defendant:
ESTEB, J. MALONE, MARION COUNTY JAIL and others
Official Capacity:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLEVINS v. C.R. ENGLAND, INC.
as 1:2010cv00461
Plaintiff:
RONALD BLEVINS
Defendant:
C.R. ENGLAND, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blevins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Scott R Blevins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kevin Blevins-Mamon v. Frank Anderson, et al
as 10-1449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK ANDERSON, MARION COUNTY JAIL, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Kevin Blevins-Mamon v. USA, et al
as 10-1416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Office of the United States Attorney, Hammond, IN and Indianapolis, IN, PETER SWAIM, US Marshal and K. FARIS, Inv. Research Spec.
Kevin Blevins v. Andrew Gottfried, et al
as 10-1244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW GOTTFRIED and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
