Cases 51 - 60 of 725
Lizalek v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2022cv00714
Petitioner:
Gary C Lizalek
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Hoops, LP, Heisley Member, Inc., Tax Matters Partn v. CIR
as 22-2012
Petitioner / Appellant:
HOOPS, LP, HEISLEY MEMBER, INC., TAX MATTERS PARTNER
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
MANO v. YELLEN et al
as 1:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
GEORGE GAIO MANO
Defendant:
JANET YELLEN, US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
SHAVER v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 3:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. SHAVER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ghetto Dope Records LLC and it's subsidiaries et al v. Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Services
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Ghetto Dope Records LLC and it's subsidiaries and Spot Kinez LLC
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Services
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Gail Goldberg v. CIR
as 22-1085
Petitioner / Appellant:
GAIL GOLDBERG
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Ronald Goldberg v. CIR
as 22-1084
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD M. GOLDBERG
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
William Flynn v. CIR
as 21-3252
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. FLYNN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Kidd, Robert v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2021cv00758
Plaintiff:
Robert Pierre Kidd
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
