Cases 51 - 60 of 560
Montgomery v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01579
Plaintiff:
Elaine Montgomery
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation, NewRez, LLC and New Residential Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Montgomery v. CITY OF CHICAGO
as 1:2022cv03697
Plaintiff:
Jannifer Montgomery
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mansoori v. Dr. Montgomery
as 1:2022cv02470
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mansoori
Defendant:
Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUSTGARD INSURANCE COMPANY v. MONTGOMERY et al
as 1:2022cv00856
Plaintiff:
TRUSTGARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ANNA MONTGOMERY, MICHAEL WASSON and TERESA WASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jean Montgomery v. Scialla Associates, Inc., et al
as 22-1771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN A. MONTGOMERY
Defendant / Appellee:
SCIALLA ASSOCIATES, INC., CHARLES SCIALLA, WILLIAM SIMPSON and others
HUNT v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv00768
Petitioner:
WYATT HUNT
Respondent:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MONTGOMERY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
BRENDA MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montgomery v. Podbielniak et al
as 1:2022cv00990
Plaintiff:
Clarence Montgomery
Defendant:
Frank Podbielniak and Village of Posen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
