Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Earl Key v. Indiana University Health Bloo, et al
as 15-1823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL R. KEY
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BLOOMINGTON HOSPITAL, MONROE COUNTY INDIANA, LUMAR GRIGGS and others
Burrows, Rae v. Monroe County et al
as 3:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rae Ann Burrows
Defendant:
Monroe County , Patricia Fish and Jerry E. Friedl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson, Deirdre v. Helgerson, Adam et al
as 3:2015cv00141
Plaintiff:
Deirdre Richardson
Defendant:
Adam Helgerson and Monroe County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Amelia Telephone Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00605
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services, Inc. and Verizon Select Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Amelia Telephone Corporation, Arvig Telephone Company, Badger Telecom, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
KEY v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH et al
as 1:2014cv01007
Defendant:
IAN BISSONNETTE, BLOOMINGTON HOSPITAL, G. THOMAS GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
EARL R. KEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SILVERS v. MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES (MCDCS) et al
as 1:2014cv00437
Defendant:
ELIZABETH BULLOCK, JANET HARGRAVE, WAYLON JAMES and others
Plaintiff:
LISA R. SILVERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MANLEY v. MONROE COUNTY PROSECUTOR
as 1:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Defendant:
MONROE COUNTY PROSECUTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANLEY v. MONROE COUNTY PROSECUTOR
as 1:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Defendant:
MONROE COUNTY PROSECUTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C. B. et al v. Hecker, Illinois
as 3:2013cv01042
Plaintiff:
C. B. , T. F. , Human Support Services and others
Defendant:
Village of Hecker, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
