Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Neville v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmacueticals,Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv50189
Plaintiff:
Mary Neville
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmacueticals,Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HECKING v. NEW HAMPSHIRE CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Defendant:
ATTY. MS. "PAT", MS. KELLY AYOTTE, MS. KATHRYN BARGER and others
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00561
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hooper, Charles v. Pederson, Gary et al
as 3:2012cv00666
Plaintiff:
Charles William Hooper
Defendant:
Gary Pederson, Saunburg, Coronado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Universal AdCom LLC d/b/a/ Fanfare Sports v. Herrin et al
as 4:2012cv04028
Plaintiff:
Universal AdCom LLC d/b/a/ Fanfare Sports
Defendant:
Harold Rocky Herrin , Evelyn Bueno, Paul Bohlander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Robbin et al
as 1:2011cv08296
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Neville Robbin and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neville v. Octa Pharma Plasma
as 3:2011cv03144
Plaintiff:
Richard Neville
Defendant:
Octa Pharma Plasma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORTHINGTON v. KNIGHT
as 2:2011cv00036
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
NEVILLE NORTHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORTHINGTON v. KNIGHT
as 2:2011cv00024
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
NEVILLE NORTHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
