Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 13,446
Reese v. Sturm
as 2:2024cv00687
Plaintiff: Thomas Reese
Defendant: Nancy Sturm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reese v. Goulee et al
as 2:2024cv00688
Plaintiff: Thomas Reese
Defendant: Michael D Goulee, Jorge Gomez, Craig Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Self, Carl v. Cromwell, Dan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00365
Plaintiff: Carl F. Self
Defendant: Dan Cromwell, Timothy Thomas, Anna Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Panarese
as 1:2024cv04597
Plaintiff: Toy Thomas Battle
Defendant: Donald Panarese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04579
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Trice v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04538
Plaintiff: Sammy O. Trice
Defendant: Thomas Dart, Cermak Medical Service/Staff and Cook County Div. 8 Classifications Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezra Hill v. City of Harvey, et al
as 24-1940
Plaintiff: EZRA HILL
Defendant: CITY OF HARVEY, GREGORY THOMAS and JASON BANKS, Deputy Police Chief
Rich-Baggett et al v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04503
Plaintiff: Shirley Rich-Baggett and Thomas Ray Baggett
Defendant: Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04523
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?