Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Dayton Poke v. Ogle County Jail, et al
as 14-2169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAYTON W. POKE
Defendant - Appellee:
OGLE COUNTY JAIL, JENNIFER ASHLY, MICHAEL HALFMAN and others
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 14-1754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN J. JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, GREG THIEL and others
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00481
Defendant:
JENNIFER COFFMAN, FBI OFFICE, SECRET SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
STACY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Peters v. Unknown U.S. Marshal(s) et al
as 1:2013cv04026
Plaintiff:
Antoine Peters
Defendant:
Unknow U.S. Marshals and Janiece Brandon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Davis v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 1:2012cv01230
Petitioner:
Keyond Davis
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals and U.S. District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DILLARD v. U.S. MARSHAL, ANN CHAMBLERS et al
as 3:2012cv00005
Defendant:
CAPT. MCQUISTON, LT. HENDRIX, LT. MCALLISTER and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY DILLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2011cv01587
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Snargrass v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
Charles Snargrass, III
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Ronald Riker, Kevin Pigos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SYKES v. ELLIOT et al
as 2:2011cv00185
Defendant:
CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE OF BOP, MR. ELLIOT, WARDEN KASNER and others
Plaintiff:
MARRICCO A. SYKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STARR v. ALDRIDG et al
as 1:2010cv00690
Defendant:
2ND MARSHAL PRESENT ON JUNE 5, 2008 and U.S. MARSHAL BRIAN ALDRIDGE
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
