Cases 51 - 60 of 95
STEWART v. BURDINE et al
as 3:2013cv00223
Defendant:
DR. BURDINE and TWO UNKNOWN NAMED DOCTORS
Plaintiff:
SABRON STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fifer v. Sangamon County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2013cv03422
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brent Fifer
Defendant:
Sangamon County Sheriff Office, Todd Guy, Medical Staff Unknown Name and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 1:2013cv02010
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Park v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 3:2013cv00957
Plaintiff:
Gens Park
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Mr President of the United States Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Yil Jo, et al v. Six Unknown Name Agents, et al
as 13-2574
Plaintiff:
ANGELO MARRISSETTE
Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAME AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA
Turner-El v. Wexford Health Care Provider Inc et al
as 3:2013cv03072
Plaintiff:
James G Turner-El
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care Provider Inc, Feinerman, . Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gayden v. Gayden et al
as 3:2013cv50083
Plaintiff:
Rashoud Gayden
Defendant:
Dawn Gayden, Holli Gayden, Angela Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayden v. Williams et al
as 3:2013cv50065
Plaintiff:
Rashoud Gayden
Defendant:
Roosevelt Williams , Jr. and "Unknown Named Car Dealership
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Name Agent
as 13-1188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAME AGENTS, or Mr. President of the United States Barack Obama
Willhelm v. Massac County et al
as 3:2012cv01117
Plaintiff:
Michael Willhelm
Defendant:
Massac County, Massac County Sheriff's Department, James R. Griffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
