Cases 61 - 70 of 1,575
Barnes v. Wachholz et al
as 2:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Barnes
Defendant:
L Wachholz, H Utter, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Sullivan
as 2:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gerald E. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01087
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Rogers
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lush, Stephen v. Nicholson, Chris et al
as 3:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Chris M. Nicholson, Noah D. Trimmer, Steve W. Steiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liddell, Jesse v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Jesse E. Liddell
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Warden Olson, Deputy Warden Ninnemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
Defendant:
3M Company, EIDP, Inc., Dupont De Nemours, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jones v. Boyack et al
as 1:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Corvon L Jones
Defendant:
Anthony J Boyack, Chad E Milone, Evan J Ruth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Radtke et al
as 2:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
D Radtke, Lt Vanlanen, Sgt Friedi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Stevens
as 2:2023cv00843
Petitioner:
Kalvin E Vaughn
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
