Cases 61 - 70 of 215
KENDRICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv02101
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MIKEL KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kendrick v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv03871
Defendant:
Officer James Hunt, #1442, City Of Chicago and Officer Vincenzo Lupo, #10401
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00356
Respondent:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Petitioner:
Kendrick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Sellers et al
as 3:2020cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kendrick H. Ingram, Sr.
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, A. Frey, L. Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers et al v. Puff et al
as 1:2019cv00504
Defendant:
Phoenix Institute, Inc. and Sue Puff
Plaintiff:
Terry Haygood, Tracy McClain, Tara Meriwether and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
as 1:2019cv07674
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
River Light V, L.P. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv07667
Plaintiff:
River Light V, L.P. and TORY BURCH LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", word4wordgospel.com, William Cozart and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gatlin, Kendrick v. McArdle, Sandra et al
as 3:2019cv00876
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Sandra McArdle
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Kendrick C. Gatlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitte v. Will County Adult Detention
as 1:2019cv04842
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Pruitte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
