Cases 61 - 70 of 997
Charles Hartsell, Jr. v. Kiana Dietz, et al
as 23-3076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES J. HARTSELL, JR.
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW MYERS, Correctional Officer, KIANA DIETZ, Classification Officer and TIMOTHY LECHLITNER, Classification Officer
Myers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Ashley L Myers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Myers v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv01281
Petitioner:
Keith Myers
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Myers et al
as 2:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
Sandra J Myers
Defendant:
Thomas Myers, Sigma-Aldrich Corp., ABC Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
COX v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
WELBY THOMAS COX, JR.
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ZACHARY A. MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stokich v. Diss et al
as 1:2023cv14159
Plaintiff:
Michael D Stokich
Defendant:
Adam Diss, . Hill, . Cravatta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Letoya Hughes, Debbie Issacs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MYERS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
MALISA L MYERS and MALISA L. MYERS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
