Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,133
MCQUEEN v. WARDEN
as 3:2023cv00159
Petitioner: STEVEN MCQUEEN
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NICE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01746
Plaintiff: STEVEN C. NICE
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01714
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stevens et al v. Thor Motor Coach Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00349
Defendant: Robin Eileen Stevens, Thomas Chester Stevens, Thor Motor Coach Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01713
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
COUNCIL v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2023cv00491
Petitioner: BRANDON MICHAEL COUNCIL
Respondent: MERRICK GARLAND and STEVEN KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FLOOD v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv01939
Plaintiff: PATRICK S. FLOOD
Defendant: WILLIAM HYATTE, JOSHUA SNOW, LORNA HARBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Marks et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff: Steven Atkins
Defendant: Jerad Marks, David Felts, Tom Chaille and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WANG v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01543
Plaintiff: XIHAI WANG
Defendant: CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, GRADDIS CODY, REED DANIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guy v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00835
Plaintiff: Dante D Guy and Dante Guy
Defendant: Steven White and M Morson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?