Cases 61 - 70 of 228
Pryor v. Corrigan et al
as 1:2017cv01968
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Pryor
Defendant:
Michael Corrigan , Nathaniel Isaak , Gregory Christoffel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEEKS v. ENDOLOGIX, INC.
as 3:2017cv00016
Defendant:
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH B. WEEKS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ristau v. Varga et al
as 3:2017cv50017
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ristau
Defendant:
John R. Varga, Sonja Nicklaus, Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. 8 Lanes a Week, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv50004
Defendant:
8 Lanes a Week, Inc., Cavalry Portfolio Serices, LLC, Cavalry SPV 1, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Boykin v. Enloe et al
as 3:2016cv50374
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Boykin
Defendant:
Enloe, Varga, Kimmeren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weeks v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv08458
Plaintiff:
Denise L. Weeks
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sobczyk v. Enloe et al
as 3:2016cv50121
Plaintiff:
William F. Sobczyk
Defendant:
Ronald Enloe, Health Care Admin. Director, James Martens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weeks et al v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2016cv03540
Plaintiff:
Danica Weeks , Erny Masila Bt Mustafa , Morojahan Simanjuntak and others
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brim et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00229
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated, Combe Products, Inc., Combe International Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Brim, Joseph McGregor, Victor Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giles et al v. Granite Broadcasting Corporation, d/b/a WEEK-TV, a/k/a Channel 25
as 1:2016cv01030
Defendant:
Granite Broadcasting Corporation, d/b/a WEEK-TV, a/k/a Channel 25
Plaintiff:
Antonio Giles , Sherry Wallace and Andrew Wallace, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
