Cases 71 - 80 of 840
VELA v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
RENE VELA
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, WVCF PLANT MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKINGBOTTOM v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HICKINGBOTTOM
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
JARMAH HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB, BEN LALOUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILBERT v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
DARYL GILBERT
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, RICHARD WHITE, PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLS v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
TIEVON NICHOLS
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL and CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMULLIN v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00440
Petitioner:
SHAWN MCMULLIN
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FELLOWS v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
AARON FELLOWS
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGETT v. USA
as 1:2023cv01888
Petitioner:
FRANK BURGETT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richwine et al v. Matuszak et al
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Lauren Richwine and Death Done Differently LLC
Defendant:
Kathleen Diane Matuszak, Thomas Sproles, Frank Downing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ORR v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
