Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Williams et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District
as 1:2014cv09669
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Williams and J.R. Williams Law, LLC
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Woods v. R.B.'s Automotive
as 1:2014cv09584
Plaintiff:
J.R. DeVere Woods
Defendant:
R.B.'s Automotive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. J.R. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00319
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE, J.R. CARAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Woods v. Panozzo et al
as 1:2014cv07436
Plaintiff:
J.R. DeVere Woods
Defendant:
Kathleen Ann Panozzo and Markham Court House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kirkendall v. AO Smith Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv09024
Plaintiff:
Mary Jean Kirkendall
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Abraham et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc
as 3:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
John Abraham , E.A. , A.A. and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
YOUNG v. DALLAS et al
as 1:2013cv00731
Defendant:
MS ANGEL, EDDIE BUSS, DR COCKERELL and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN G. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.R. et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2011cv00212
Defendant:
DAVID CARTER, SCOTT KOSIELAK, SHAWN ROMERIL and others
Plaintiff:
J.R. and SHAWNA REED-HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jesse v. Sphinx Systemhouse, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv08037
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jesse
Defendant:
Sphinx Systemhouse, Inc., Subbu Aluri , J.R. Rammohan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irshad Learning Center v. County Of Dupage et al
as 1:2010cv02168
Plaintiff:
Irshad Learning Center
Defendant:
County Of Dupage, Robert J. Schillerstrom, Robert J. Kartholl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
