Cases 71 - 80 of 150
Marquez v. RCKC Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv07977
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, Connz Corp., Conn Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Norma Marquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Moffitt et al
as 3:2018cv50377
Defendant:
James Hagler, R. Bracey, Lt. Boel and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Baker et al v. BRG Sports, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00129
Plaintiff:
Quincy Baker , James Bradshaw , Hollis Beau Bridges and others
Defendant:
BRG Sports, Inc. and Riddell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beasley v Marquez et al
as 4:2017cv04272
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
George Marquez, Ron Cervantez, Benjamin Schnerre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bulgari, S.p.A. v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The
as 1:2017cv07007
Plaintiff:
Bulgari, S.p.A.
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Wen Jie Xu, Zhao Dequn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Mondragon v. City of Rockford et al
as 3:2017cv50252
Plaintiff:
Jourdan Mondragon
Defendant:
City of Rockford , Emillo Marquez and Owen McGuinness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Mitchell v. Town of Cicero et al
as 1:2017cv03563
Defendant:
Town of Cicero , Andrew Marquez, Profirio Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Marquez et al
as 1:2017cv03150
Plaintiff:
Zsoch Dunn
Defendant:
Eric Marquez, Daniel Padilla, Steve Joung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marson v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2017cv00545
Plaintiff:
Sarah Marson
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Mary Kuhnmuench, Carl Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
