Cases 81 - 90 of 732
Smith, James v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2023cv00522
Petitioner:
James Alfred Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary Kevin A. Carr and Warden Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Evers et al
as 2:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Governor Tony Evers and Secretary Kevin Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardipee v. Delain et al
as 2:2023cv01012
Petitioner:
Richard Thomas Gardipee
Respondent:
Todd Delain, Kevin Carr and Christopher Saldana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardipee v. Carr et al
as 2:2023cv01010
Petitioner:
Richard Thomas Gardipee
Respondent:
Kevin A Carr, Todd Delain, Christopher Saldana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sean Stankowski v. Kevin Carr, et al
as 23-2458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN STANKOWSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN CARR, CINDY O'DONNELL, EMILY DAVIDSON and others
Chapman v. Carr
as 2:2023cv00954
Plaintiff:
Jacorey Chapman
Defendant:
CO Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuether v. Posley et al
as 2:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Debroah Kuether
Defendant:
Keith P Posley, Jeremiah Holiday, Robert Peterson and others
Washington v. Karlin et al
as 4:2023cv04110
Plaintiff:
Marion Devonne Washington, Sr
Defendant:
Jeremy Karlin, Bryan Anderson, Nathan Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carr et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04017
Plaintiff:
Labyron Carr and Cappin4Capo, Inc.
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Safiyanu Sahibu and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Liddell v. Carr et al
as 2:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
Jesse E Liddell
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Clinton Bryant, Michelle Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
