Cases 81 - 90 of 126
Jeffrey Rowe v. Rose Vaisvilas, et al
as 14-3316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY A. ROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSE VAISVILAS, WAYNE SCAIFE, DEB DOTSON and others
DOTSON v. USA
as 1:2014cv01648
Petitioner:
STEVEN DOTSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dotson v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07261
Plaintiff:
Lionel Dotson
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Lilly USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross v. Bald et al
as 1:2014cv06506
Plaintiff:
Earl Gene Ross, Jr.
Defendant:
Taniko Bald, Marcus Dotson, Demote Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Colts
as 1:2014cv06198
Plaintiff:
Darius T. Dotson
Defendant:
Ms. Colts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Dart
as 1:2014cv05944
Plaintiff:
Darius Todd Dotson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv05761
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dotson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv05173
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dotson
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yunek v. Officer Amy Dotson, a City of Peoria, Illinois Police Officer, In Her Individual Capacity et al
as 1:2014cv01220
Plaintiff:
Yunek Moore
Defendant:
Officer Amy Dotson, a City of Peoria, Illinois Police Officer, In Her Individual Capacity, Officer Craig Williams, a City of Peoria, Illinois Police Officer, In His Individual Capacity, Officer Thomas Bond, a City of Peoria, Illinois Police Officer, In His Individual Capacity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOTSON v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 1:2014cv00826
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY DOTSON
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
