Cases 81 - 90 of 203
FREEMAN MARSH v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02773
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA FREEMAN MARSH
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MARTIN v. STATE OF INDIANA POLICE et al
as 4:2018cv00140
Defendant:
COOPER AND FREEMAN, ASHLEY ARBIN, STATE OF INDIANA POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLEN MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv02046
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NEUBERT, JASMINE FREEMAN, KIZZY STARNES and others
Defendant:
BAYER AG, BAYER ESSURE INC., BAYER S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANLEY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv02254
Defendant:
KRUL, A. PETTY, J. DENNEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. FREEMAN
as 4:2018cv00076
Defendant:
LOGAN FORDICE, BRAD FREEMAN and CHARLES S. MURPHY
Plaintiff:
WAYMON D. THOMAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FOSTER et al
as 4:2018cv00032
Defendant:
JOEY BARRIS, JAUSH CLARK, DERICK FOSTER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYMAN D. THOMAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Warden
as 3:2017cv00789
Petitioner:
Dennis R Freeman, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CWK INVESTMENTS - HILLSDALE, LLC v. TOWN OF DARMSTADT et al
as 3:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
CWK INVESTMENTS - HILLSDALE, LLC
Defendant:
PAUL FREEMAN, STEVE KAHRE, PHIL MCELROY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Freeman v State of Indiana et al
as 1:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dimitric Freeman
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Fort Wayne City of , Marc DeShaies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
