Cases 81 - 90 of 859
Todd Peterson v. Lizzie Tegels
as 23-1070
Petitioner / Appellant:
TODD E. PETERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
LIZZIE TEGELS, Warden
Peterson v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq00036
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
George William Peterson
Defendant:
Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07216
Plaintiff:
Erik Peterson
Defendant:
Acting Cm'r SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Coley v. Peterson et al
as 3:2022cv00974
Plaintiff:
Amir Coley
Defendant:
Treyvyon Peterson and Carlos Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson, Troy v. Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Troy A. Peterson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erickson v. The UPS Store, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06155
Defendant:
The UPS Store, Inc., UPS Store, Lindsey Schultz (Wilczewski) and others
Plaintiff:
H Erickson and H. Erickson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Robert Peacher v. Paul Plant, III, et al
as 22-2854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT PEACHER
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL PLANT, III, Officer, JENNIFER SCHURMAN, AARON LONG and others
Jason Peterson v. Jeanie James, et al
as 22-2790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON PETERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JEANIE JAMES, DARIN WELLS, STEPHANIE WAGGONER and others
Marcus Cannon v. Racine County, Wisconsin, et al
as 22-2723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS DENTELLE CANNON
Defendant / Appellee:
RACINE COUNTY, WISCONSIN, KARIE POPE, ERIC PETERSON and others
Peterson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Taylor Peterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
