Cases 81 - 90 of 1,066
JAMES v. XCEEDANCE INC et al
as 1:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
REX JAMES
Defendant:
XCEEDANCE INC, TRAVIS MACMILLAN, SACHIN KULKARNI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Maxfield v. USA
as 3:2023cv02372
Petitioner:
Travis Cole Maxfield
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dickerson v. Ball et al
as 2:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Travis Dickerson
Defendant:
Denita R Ball and Milwaukee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wisnauski v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wisnauski
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Travis Bayler, Dr. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAULERSON et al v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS RAULERSON and LANCE WORLAND
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, TANESHA CREAR, UNKNOWN JAIL OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins, Troy v. Chippewa County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Defendant:
Chippewa County Sheriffs Dept., Sheriff Travis Hakes, Capt. Modl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NVR Branding Corporation v. Korth et al
as 1:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
NVR Branding Corporation and NVR Branding Corporation doing business as Fox Cities Embroidery
Defendant:
Travis Korth, Yeomans, Inc. and Yeomans Inc doing business as SportsWorld
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Huyck v. Patten
as 2:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
Travis Huyck
Defendant:
Richard Patten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv03286
Plaintiff:
Daron Donell Travis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
USA v. Travis Montgomery
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAVIS MONTGOMERY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
