Cases 81 - 90 of 475,907
Wareka v. Radiant Beauty Med Spa Management Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04088
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
Radiant Beauty Med Spa Management Inc. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
People Of The State Of Illinois et al v. Keeler
as 1:2024cv04083
Plaintiff:
People Of The State Of Illinois and City Of Hickory Hills
Defendant:
Kevin J. Keeler
Washington v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
James Orlando Washington and James O Washington
Defendant:
Nancy B Marthakis, Centurion Health of Indiana LLC, Ashley Burnham and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LILLARD v. RULE et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
COREY LILLARD
Respondent:
T. RULE and WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JAMES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
DAMON JAMES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and BRANCHVILLE INSTITUTION/WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. PAYNE et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE JARMAINE HARRELL
Defendant:
PAYNE and ASHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alan Wyman v. Christine Brannon-Dortch
as 24-1871
Petitioner:
ALAN WYMAN
Respondent:
CHRISTINE BRANNON-DORTCH, Warden
Homesteader's Store, Inc. v. Kubota Tractor Corporation
as 24-1870
Plaintiff:
HOMESTEADER'S STORE, INC.
Defendant:
KUBOTA TRACTOR CORPORATION
Roy v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04135
Plaintiff:
Shawnelle Roy
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill et al v. Lineage Logistics Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv04115
Plaintiff:
Darcell Hill and Ronald Hall
Defendant:
Lineage Logistics Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
