Cases 1 - 10 of 2,981
Lauritsen, Derek et al v. Hiawatha National Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Derek Lauritsen, Melissa Thompson, Wayne Vlasnik and others
Defendant:
Hiawatha National Bank, Roger Ray, Dale Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ailion v. Healthcare Solutions Team, LLC
as 1:2024cv03904
Respondent:
Adam Ailion and Healthcare Solutions Team, LLC
Petitioner:
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Hawkins v. Mawhorr et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kameron Hawkins
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dan Mawhorr, Conrad Dyer, Cody Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Delon Scott
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Brittany Greene, Tara Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEUGH et al v. NADLER et al
as 1:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTA PEUGH and BCC CONCESSIONS, LLC
Defendant:
ADAM J. NADLER and TWISTED TATERS FOOD TRUCK AND MORE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Moore v. Lofgren et al
as 1:2024cv03618
Plaintiff:
Ce'Andre D Moore
Defendant:
M Lofgren, Yuhas, T Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
