Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dixson v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10706
Plaintiff:
Kecia Dixson
Defendant:
Revlon Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dixson v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv08859
Plaintiff:
Delores Dixson
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc, AFAM Concept Inc. dba JF Labs Inc., Dabur International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dixson v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Daishun Stephon Dixson
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail and Jane and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Milwaukee County Jail
as 2:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Daishun Stephon Dixon and Daishun Stephon Dixson
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02673
Plaintiff:
SHANAE S. DIXON and SHENAE S. DIXSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DIXSON v. BROWN et al
as 2:2021cv00169
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMMON, RICHARD BROWN, SHERIFF ROBERT CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DIXSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXSON v. USA
as 1:2020cv00233
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL DIXSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07620
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Means v. In Fomur Hopislt, et al.
as 1:2017cv05046
Plaintiff:
Joel Means
Defendant:
In Fomur Hopislt, Dixson Warden Vayar and Doctor Narwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Means v. Dixson Policer Department et al
as 1:2017cv05045
Plaintiff:
Joel Means
Defendant:
Dixson Policer Department and Lirgen Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
