Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Lindell, Nate v. Moreno, Peter et al
as 3:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Nate A. Lindell
Defendant:
Peter Moreno, Jennifer Fandel, Kevin A. Carr and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
SLABAUGH v. CHURCHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION IV et al
as 1:2021cv01652
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLEIN, ATIEVA, INC. doing business as LUCID MOTORS, PETER RAWLINSON and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. SLABAUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Karant Photo, Inc. v. Churchill Corporate Services, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02321
Defendant:
Churchill Corporate Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karant Photo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Israel v. USA, et al.
as 1:2020cv06608
Respondent:
The Estate of Churchill Hunt Community Association, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Angela Israel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Churchill v. Commissioner of SSA
as 4:2020cv04204
Plaintiff:
Linda Churchill
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Churchill v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00295
Petitioner:
Kenneth Churchill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Churchill v. Commissioner of SSA
as 4:2018cv04032
Plaintiff:
Linda Churchill
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
CHURCHILL v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2017cv03887
Defendant:
BARDONNER, CORIZON HEALTH, GLOVER and others
Plaintiff:
KENT CHURCHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Earl v. Howard et al
as 1:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
Clyde Earl
Defendant:
Jonathan J. Howard , Steve Paschos , Tushar Advani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
