Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Walker, Jason v. Rosenberg, G.
as 3:2024cv00168
Respondent:
Jason Walker and G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gadson, Bernard v. Rosenberg, G.
as 3:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Bernard Gadson
Respondent:
G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rhodes, Brookes v. Rosenberg, G.
as 3:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Brooks Rhodes and Brookes Rhodes
Respondent:
G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ozuna v. Rosenberg
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Carlos P. Ozuna
Respondent:
FCI Oxford, Warden and G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christiansen, Robert v. Rosenberg, G.
as 3:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Robert Christiansen
Respondent:
Warden G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wise v. Winnebago County Sherriff
as 3:2023cv50364
Plaintiff:
Stacey Wise
Defendant:
Winnebago County Sherriff, Gary Caruana, Robert Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rosenberger v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02679
Plaintiff:
Denny Rosenberger
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Kopack v. Landline Trans, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Natalie Kopack
Defendant:
Landline Transportation, LLC, Tamas Rosenberger and Landline Trans LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
