Cases 1 - 10 of 7,459
ELLIS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
BRITTANY A. TORRES, KYLEIGH J. INGALIS, LETICIA MARTINEZ-MATEOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
BROWNING v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BROWNING
Defendant:
ADAMS and WALK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Brown et al
as 3:2024cv03139
Plaintiff:
Shaun M Koontz
Defendant:
Candie Brown and Stefanie Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown
as 1:2024cv04554
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Brown v. Proviso Township High School District 209
as 1:2024cv04555
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Brown
Defendant:
Proviso Township High School District 209
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Brown v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01414
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Warren Brown
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. EyeSouth Eye Care Services LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04537
Plaintiff:
Rachel Davis
Defendant:
EyeSouth Eye Care Services LLC d/b/a EyeSouth Partners, Ocular Partners PLLC d/b/a Arbor Center for Eyecare PLLC, Dr. Chris Albanis and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Arnold et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv04452
Plaintiff:
Denise Arnold, Blaire Brown and Sandre Wilson
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
