Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Thigpen et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv03115
Plaintiff: Douglas Thigpen and Myron Rockett
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Officer Suzanne L. Niemoth, Star No. 17958, Officer Nicholas K. Dedore, Star No. 6889 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thigpen v. Jackson
as 1:2021cv03398
Plaintiff: Timothy Thigpen
Defendant: Carla Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thigpen v. Saul
as 1:2020cv04990
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff: James T. Thighen and James T. Thigpen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Thigpen v. Inman et al
as 3:2020cv50314
Defendant: Waltert, T. Albertson and Inman
Plaintiff: Jerrod Harvey Thigpen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thigpen v. Sproul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00663
Petitioner: Antonio K. Thigpen
Respondent: T. G. Werlick and Dan Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oliver, et al v. Riddell, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07766
Plaintiff: Michael Pelton, Willard Harrell, LaBrandon Toefield and others
Defendant: BRG Sports Holding Corp., BRG Sports, LLC, All American Sports Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2019cv07388
Defendant: Brian Thigpen, Sandy Garrett and Village of Dolton
Plaintiff: Rashawn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Enge v. Dethrow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv06151
Defendant: Lilly Diaz, Joseph Dethrow, Hany Shalabi and others
Plaintiff: Choice Enge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Werlick We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00867
Petitioner: Antonio K. Thigpen
Respondent: T. G. Werlick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thigpen v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv08792
Plaintiff: James T. Thigpen
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?