Cases 1 - 10 of 6,425
Singleton v. Leposky et al
as 3:2024cv01543
Plaintiff:
John U. Singleton
Defendant:
G. Leposky, Lightfoot, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ealom et al v. Goldcoast Carriers, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05217
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ealom and Miguel Fernandez
Defendant:
Goldcoast Carriers, Inc. and DMG Consulting & Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ross v. Swisstek et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
LaRon Anthony Ross, Sr, LaRon Anthony Ross and LaRon Ross
Defendant:
Mark Swisstek, A Watt, Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEWART v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. STEWART
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Cordova, Anthony v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordova
Defendant:
Kevin A. Carr, Sarah Cooper and Randall Hepp
Not Yet Classified:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks et al v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03163
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendricks and Justin Snow
Defendant:
Anthony Grootens, Brian Curran, Deana Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley v. Schneider et al
as 3:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Anthony Crawley and Anthony M Crawley
Defendant:
Joe Schneider and Dawn Bus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock, Dylan v. Barron County, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Dylan Hancock
Defendant:
Barron County, Wisconsin, Sheriff Chris Fitzgerald, Deputy Eric Sedani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Wills
as 1:2024cv01222
Petitioner:
Howard Ellis
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
