Cases 1 - 10 of 18
E*Trade Securities LLC v. Felipe Gomez, et al
as 21-1597
Defendant:
ARTHUR JAMES MUELLMAN GOMEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIPE N. GOMEZ
E*Trade Securities LLC v. Felipe N. Gomez
as 20-3349
Defendant:
ARTHUR JAMES MUELLMAN GOMEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIPE N. GOMEZ
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Gomez et al
as 1:2019cv03833
Defendant:
Felipe Nery Gomez, Athur James Muellman Gomez and Arthur James Muellman Gomez
Plaintiff:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
E*TRADE Securities LLC v. Gomez et al
as 1:2019cv00827
Defendant:
Arthur James Muellman Gomez and Felipe Nery Gomez
Interpleader:
E Trade Securities LLC
Plaintiff:
E*TRADE Securities LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez et al v. Schwab, Corp et al
as 1:2019cv00540
Defendant:
Garrett Wynne, John and Jane Doe, Charles Schwab, Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Muellman Gomez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flowers v. Kaupas et al
as 1:2015cv03707
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Flowers
Defendant:
Paul Kaupas, Brian Fink, Roy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Restricted Filer v Superintendent
as 3:2009cv00074
Petitioner:
Arthur James Rogers
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers v. Superintendent
as 3:2008cv00182
Petitioner:
Arthur James Rogers
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Indiana State Prison Superintendent
as 3:2007cv00567
Petitioner:
Arthur James Rogers
Respondent:
Indiana State Prison Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
