Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Estate of Daniel Pesavento et al v. Rudebeck et al
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Estate of Daniel Pesavento and HP
Defendant:
Bryce Rudebeck and City of Appleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Appleton v. Dodson et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Ebony Appleton
Defendant:
Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Appleton v. Methodist NL Hospital
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Ebony Appleton
Defendant:
Methodist NL Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Appleton v. Gary City of
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ebony Appleton
Defendant:
City of Gary and Gary City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCaigue et al v. Edwards et al
as 2:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
Shawn McCaigue and Kathleen McCaigue
Defendant:
Brandon Edwards, Carrie Peters, City of Appleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Appleton et al v. L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09462
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta C Appleton and James Appleton
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gill v. Woelfel et al
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Jordan Woelfel, S Enneper, Alex Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Appleton et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tavion Williams
Defendant:
City of Appleton, John Ostermeier and Aaron Pynenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
