Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Everett v. Garden et al
as 3:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Bobby D. Everett, Jr.
Defendant:
Andy Garden, Troy Reed and B. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ash v. Garden et al
as 3:2021cv01329
Plaintiff:
Troy Ash
Defendant:
Andy Garden, Troy Reed, B Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daryle Carter v. Chris Rivers
as 21-1395
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARYLE B. CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRIS RIVERS
Luis Segovia, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-4240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS SEGOVIA, JOSE ANTONIO TORRES, PAMELA LYNN COLON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ASHTON B. CARTER, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Defense, FEDERAL VOTING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM and others
Doe et al v. USA et al
as 3:2016cv00640
Plaintiff:
James Doe and Susan Doe
Defendant:
USA , United States Department of Defense , Ashton B. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laura Jennings v. City of Indianapolis, et al
as 16-1110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURA A. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ASHTON B. CARTER, Secretary of Defense, CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and others
JENNINGS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2016cv00004
Defendant:
ASHTON B. CARTER, CITY OF INDIANAPOILS, ET AL, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
LAURA A. JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CARTER v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv01845
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. CARTER
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Che Carter v. Keith Butt
as 13-2466
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHE B. CARTER
Respondent - Appellee:
KEITH BUTTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
