Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Everest National Insurance Company v. Baysinger Architects PLLC et al
as 3:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Everest National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Baysinger Architects PLLC and Capital Development Board of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
McEwan v. Villafuerte et al
as 1:2020cv00722
Plaintiff:
Paige McEwan
Defendant:
City of Waukegan, Waukegan Police Officer Rolando Villafuerte, Waukegan Police Officer Joseph Baysinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Baysinger et al
as 1:2019cv03891
Defendant:
Officer Ferdina, Officer Villafuerte, Officer Whitea and others
Plaintiff:
Cutberta Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVES v. MCKINNEY et al
as 2:2018cv00440
Defendant:
PRICE, BAYSINGER, INDIANA DEPORTMENT OF CORRECTION POLICY MANAGER COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. REAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CITY OF ANDERSON et al
as 1:2012cv01153
Defendant:
JOHN BAYSINGER and CITY OF ANDERSON
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. BAYSINGER
as 2:2010cv00292
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BAYSINGER
Petitioner:
ERIC D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Vance v. Edwin Buss, et al
as 10-3093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN T. VANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWIN G. BUSS, JAMES BAYSINGER, JERRY SNYDER and others
VANCE v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv00703
Defendant:
JAMES BAYSINGER, EDWIN BUSS, TERESA LITTLEJOHN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. VANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. BAYSINGER
as 2:2010cv00073
Respondent:
JAMES BAYSINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LASHBROOK v. BAYSINGER
as 1:2010cv00338
Respondent:
JAMES BAYSINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
