Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Moore v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
as 1:2023cv16200
Plaintiff:
D.M. and Brian Moore
Defendant:
MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marvin Matthews v. Antonio Chambers, et al
as 20-1358
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTONIO CHAMBERS, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHCARE AND FAMILY SERVICES and BRIAN MOORE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVIN L. MATTHEWS
Matthews v. Chambers et al
as 1:2019cv07519
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Matthews
Defendant:
Brian Moore, Antonio Chambers and Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services (Joliet Office)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamon v. Korte et al
as 3:2019cv03228
Defendant:
Stephen Bradshaw, Jeffrey Korte, Ryan Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. USA
as 1:2016cv00158
Petitioner:
BRIAN MOORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MOORE et al
as 1:2015cv02025
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MOORE
Defendant:
ROSS G. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Tibbet v. Ian McPherson, et al
as 14-1761
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL TIBBET
Defendant - Appellant:
IAN MCPHERSON, individually as Police Officer for the City of Seymour, Indiana and BRIAN MOORE, individually as Police Officer for the City of Seymour, Indiana
TIBBETT v. McPHERSON et al
as 4:2013cv00004
Defendant:
WILLIAM ABBOTT, CITY OF SEYMOUR, INDIANA, BRIAN MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TIBBETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. LAHRMAN et al
as 4:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MILLER
Defendant:
MARC LAHRMAN, JEFF WALTERS, RICK HIRTZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
