Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Demajio Ellis v. Linda Carper, et al
as 24-1755
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
LINDA CARPER, JOHNATHAN JACKSON, Sergeant, BRIAN MARTZ and others
ELLIS v. DAVIS CARPER et al
as 1:2021cv02750
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
LINDA DAVIS CARPER, JODIE MURPHY, BRITTNEY GROVES-MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruderman v. Prim et al
as 3:2017cv50130
Plaintiff:
Aleksey Ruderman
Defendant:
Bill Prim, David Devane, Chad B. Carper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shamburger et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Sydney Shamburger , Lewis Campbell, Jr. , Dennis Northcutt and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00158
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Herbert Whitlock v. Charles Brueggemann, et al
as 11-1059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HERBERT WHITLOCK
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. BRUEGGEMANN, DIANE CARPER, STEVE FERMON and others
Gordon Steidl v. Charles Brueggemann, et al
as 11-1070
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GORDON R. STEIDL
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. BRUEGGEMANN, DIANE CARPER, STEVE FERMON and others
Gordon Steidl v. Charles Brueggemann, et al
as 10-3527
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GORDON R. STEIDL
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. BRUEGGEMANN, DIANE CARPER, STEVEN M. FERMON and others
Herbert Whitlock v. Charles Brueggemann, et al
as 10-3528
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HERBERT WHITLOCK
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. BRUEGGEMANN, DIANE CARPER, STEVEN M. FERMON and others
Carper v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv20184
Plaintiff:
Cora Carper
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
