Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Requena et al v. Dib, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04520
Defendant:
Montra Kaenkumjorn, Dib, Inc. and Ladawan Thongthomya
Plaintiff:
Fredy Cardona Requena and Silvia Cifuentes Navarro De Vasquez
Santos Reyes-Cifuentes v. William Barr
as 20-1267
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
SANTOS W. REYES-CIFUENTES
GOMEZ CIFUENTES v. ZIERTEN
as 3:2019cv00232
Defendant:
JOHN WILLIAM ZIERTEN
Plaintiff:
LINA ANDREA GOMEZ CIFUENTES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 b
Williams, Jr. v. Alverez et al
as 1:2017cv04792
Plaintiff:
Jerry Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Anita M Alverez, Mary Pat Devereux, E Bracamontes, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freddie Warren v. John Doe Officers 1-5
as 1:2015cv11879
Plaintiff:
Freddie Warren
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
P.O. Berka, P.O. Cifuentes, P.O. R. Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Conner v. P.O. Diaz et al
as 1:2015cv04944
Plaintiff:
Marcus Conner
Defendant:
P.O. Diaz, Juan Cifuentes and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIFUENTES v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00053
Plaintiff:
FELIPE CIFUENTES
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIE G. MAFFETT v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
KYLE ANDERSON, LARRY A ANDERSON, JEREMY BIRDWELD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeler v. Cifuentes et al
as 1:2012cv07612
Plaintiff:
Richard Keeler
Defendant:
Juan Cifuentes, Wilfredo Roman, Mark Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
