Cases 1 - 10 of 291
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Means v. Pegan et al
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Robert Means
Defendant:
Brandon Cox, CITY OF KENDALLVILLE, INDIANA, Kevin Pegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00372
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Erika L Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Evanoff v. Garrett P.D. et al
as 1:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Brylon, Skyler Castro, Garrett P.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Evanoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00684
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cox and Brooklyn Cox
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
COX v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2024cv01122
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff:
WELBY THOMAS COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Phillips v. Staton et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Brock M. Staton, M Lester and M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. COX et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
CORY MARTEZ SMITH
Defendant:
C. COX, M. SHEPPARD, J. MEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. iGel Beauty LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Cox
Defendant:
iGel Beauty LLC and 2200 Industrial Way S, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
