Cases 1 - 10 of 4,368
Davis v. Avlon Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05344
Plaintiff:
Robin L Davis
Defendant:
Avlon Industries, Inc., MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2024cv05343
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Davis
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ambers v. Tippecanoe County et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Michael E Ambers
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County, Tippecanoe County Sheriff, Jared Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01515
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Davis v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04956
Plaintiff:
Sibylline Davis
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DAVIS v. CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
RICCI DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC and JASON CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
OMAR DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK MURRAY and WOLKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRUDEN et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
MYRON S. PRUDEN, MARK C.O. COOK, SHANE C. HENDRICK and others
Defendant:
W. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
