Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Dorsey v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03367
Plaintiff:
Mary Dorsey
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Shaquille Prince v. Michael Michienzi, et al
as 24-1514
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE PRINCE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MICHIENZI, #357 Romeoville PD, VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE and TOM DORSEY
Nicole Dorsey v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02636
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DORSEY
Defendant:
REVLON, INC.,, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, L'OREAL USA PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dorsey Jr v. Lapointe et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jovon Dorsey Jr and Jovon Dorsey, Jr
Defendant:
Sherry Lapointe, William Hyatte and Gapski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey Jr v. Lapointe et al
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jovon Dorsey Jr and Jovon Dorsey, Jr
Defendant:
Sherry Lapointe, William Hyatte and Gapski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bivens v. Thorstad et al
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Aryvles Dontrell Bivens
Defendant:
J. Thorstad, Batres, A. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Stateville Correctional Center et al
as 1:2023cv16706
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Horton
Defendant:
Stateville Correctional Center, Lt Dorsey, Sag White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16515
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Hollis, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
