Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Brown v. Barrone et al
as 3:2023cv50259
Plaintiff:
John E. Brown
Defendant:
Daniel Lee Barrone and Sharon Barrone-Lyford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. BROWN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Howard Brown v. Timothy Retzlaff, et al
as 23-2160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD E. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY RETZLAFF, SIREENA PETERSON, CARY S. SMITH and others
Clinton C. Barlow, III v. Freda L. Wolfson, et al
as 23-1187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDA L. WOLFSON, ROGER TANEY, GARRET E. BROWN, JR. and others
Brown v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02751
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Brown
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown, III v. Commissioner of SSA
as 3:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Brown, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BISHOP v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv01927
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ANDREW BISHOP
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO GROUP, INC., J. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton Barlow, III v. Freda Wolfson, et al
as 22-2441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDA WOLFSON, ROGER TANEY, GARRET E. BROWN, JR. and others
FARMERS NEW CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE ESTATE OF PHILLIP E. BROWN, JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01534
Plaintiff:
FARMERS NEW CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF PHILLIP E. BROWN, JR., MIDEAST DELIVERY SOLUTIONS LLC, RONALD HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
