Cases 1 - 10 of 119
SISK v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2018cv00404
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, EDWIN G. BUSS, COMMISSIONER and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISK v. PENCE et al
as 1:2016cv01855
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, EDWIN G. BUSS, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISK v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2015cv01789
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR., KENNETH GRAY and others
Fourth Party Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOOMBS v. BUSS et al
as 1:2013cv02041
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER and EDWIN G. BUSS
Plaintiff:
TONY TOOMBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lokmar Abdul-Wadood v. Edwin Buss, et al
as 13-2181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOKMAR YAZID ABDUL-WADOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWIN G. BUSS, JIM WYNN, BRYAN PEARSON and others
Honorable v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jerry T Honorable
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon , Edwin G Buss , Mark Levenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILSON v. BUSS
as 1:2012cv00481
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS
Plaintiff:
UNDRAY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Holleman v. Charles Penfold, et al
as 12-1794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE HOLLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES A. PENFOLD, EDWIN G. BUSS, M. HALE and others
HULL v. BUSS et al
as 1:2012cv00340
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS, KEITH BUTTS, ALLEN FINNAN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. HULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ransom v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Marwan Ransom
Defendant:
Indiana State of , Indiana Department of Corrections , Bruce Lemmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
