Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Clark-Easterling v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08095
Plaintiff:
Jessica Clark-Easterling
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
USA v. Christopher Easterling
as 23-1143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. EASTERLING
EASTERLING v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASTERLING
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JAMES P. HANLON, JANE MAGNUS-STINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
EASTERLING v. MIAMI VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASTERLING
Defendant:
MIAMI VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EASTERLING v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASTERLING
Defendant:
MIKE DEWINE and THOMAS ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EASTERLING v. AFZAL et al
as 1:2022cv01364
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASTERLING
Defendant:
KAMRON AFZAL, THOMAS HAGEL and CARL HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Texas Hill Country Landscaping Inc. et al v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00227
Plaintiff:
Morning Star Farms, Northwest Recycling, LLC, Easterling Wood Products Inc. and others
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
USA v. Christopher Easterling
as 21-2097
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. EASTERLING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Easterling et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00845
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daryl Easterling and Ashley Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
