Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robinson v. Wexford Health Care et al
as 3:2023cv02660
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care, Juanita Harris, Allyson Fiscus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiscus v. Embrey et al
as 1:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
Robert L Fiscus
Defendant:
Embrey, Christians, Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiscus v. Embrey et al
as 2:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
Robert L Fiscus
Defendant:
Embrey, Christians, Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiscus v. Embrey et al
as 1:2022cv05125
Plaintiff:
Robert L Fiscus
Defendant:
C.O. Embrey, C.O. Christians, Sgt. Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FISCUS v. BRENNAN et al
as 1:2021cv02872
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN JACOB FISCUS
Defendant:
MATTHEW BRENNAN, MICHAEL FORD and NICHOLIS REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Stout et al
as 3:2018cv02209
Defendant:
L.T. McCaslin, C/O Stout, Dr. Ritz and others
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon Parker v. Christopher Duckworth, et al
as 16-1648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GORDON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER DUCKWORTH, in his individual capacity as an Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Officer and JAMES FISCUS, in his individual capacity as an Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Officer
PARKER v. DUCKWORTH et al
as 1:2014cv01854
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DUCKWORTH and JAMES FISCUS
Plaintiff:
GORDON PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holm v. Bunny's Of Urbana, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02086
Plaintiff:
Matthew A Holm
Defendant:
Bunny's of Urbana Inc , Randall Lee Danley, Robert Fiscus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FISCUS et al v. FRANKLIN et al
as 3:2009cv00048
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE FISCUS and DANNY FISCUS
Defendant:
BENJAMIN R. FRANKLIN, ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION and ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
