Cases 1 - 10 of 286
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company v. River Plaza Homeowners Association et al
as 1:2024cv03906
Plaintiff:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
River Plaza Homeowners Association, Esther Geppert, AK Agrawal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Flynn v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00906
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kevin Flynn
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green v. Flynn Restaurant Group, LP et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Dustin Green
Defendant:
Flynn Restaurant Group, LP, Bell American Group and Bell American Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Willie Orr v. Zorian Trusewych, et al
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
WILLIE D. ORR
Defendant:
ZORIAN TRUSEWYCH, Doctor, JESSICA GIVENS, PENNY SMITH and others
Taebel v. Flynn
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Elizabeth A. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Willie Orr v. Zorian Trusewych, et al
as 24-1185
Plaintiff:
WILLIE D. ORR
Defendant:
ZORIAN TRUSEWYCH, Doctor, JESSICA GIVENS, PENNY SMITH and others
FLYNN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
DEANDRE FLYNN
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tony Webster v. Kellen Williams, et al
as 23-3425
Plaintiff:
TONY WEBSTER
Defendant:
KELLEN WILLIAMS, JUSTIN GALL, SHAMAILA GORSI and others
FLYNN v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00581
Petitioner:
DEANDRE' FLYNN
Respondent:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
